<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Hi Roy<br>
    <br>
    I will check with WMO to find out and get back to you.<br>
    <br>
    regards, Greg<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11-Nov-13 19:08, Lowry, Roy K.
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:40829B0E077C1145A6DE44D39B3830A9233E39139C@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 10.00.9200.16721">
      <style id="owaTempEditStyle"></style>
      <style title="owaParaStyle"><!--P {
        MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px
}
--></style>
      <div style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; COLOR:
        #000000; DIRECTION: ltr" danaprelude="1">
        <div>Thanks Greg,</div>
        <div>&nbsp;</div>
        <div>There seems to be some support for my reservations about
          using L22 in this way. I'd already thought of using C3 as a
          way out of the current difficulties for SeaDataNet. Do you
          know of any way to address the C3 entries as a URL? If not I
          could consider serving it to provide this capability.</div>
        <div>&nbsp;</div>
        <div>Cheers, Roy.</div>
        <div dir="ltr">&nbsp;</div>
        <div id="divRpF727557" style="DIRECTION: ltr">
          <hr tabindex="-1">
          <font size="2" face="Tahoma" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Greg
            Reed [<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:greg@metoc.gov.au">greg@metoc.gov.au</a>]<br>
            <b>Sent:</b> 11 November 2013 05:27<br>
            <b>To:</b> Lowry, Roy K.; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:seavox@mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk">seavox@mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk</a><br>
            <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Seavox] A question of principle on
            instruments<br>
          </font><br>
        </div>
        <div>Roy<br>
          <br>
          I would steer clear of differentiating probes based on
          fall-rate equations. <br>
          <br>
          XBT biases are a function of the year of manufacture and this
          would require duplicate entries for some probes with the
          different fall-rate coefficients.
          <style>@font-face {
        font-family: Calibri;
}
@page WordSection1 {margin: 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 115%
}
LI.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 115%
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 115%
}
.MsoChpDefault {
        FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"
}
.MsoPapDefault {
        MARGIN-BOTTOM: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 115%
}
DIV.WordSection1 {
        
}
</style>The user would then need to know which coefficients applied to a
          given instrument.<br>
          <br>
          One option would be to add a note in the definition section of
          L22 to refer to WMO common Code table C3 which lists fall rate
          equation coefficients for profile measurement instruments.<br>
          <br>
          regards, Greg<br>
          <br>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div dir="ltr"><br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">From: <b
                  class="gmail_sendername">Lowry, Roy K.</b> <span
                  dir="ltr">
                  &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:rkl@bodc.ac.uk">rkl@bodc.ac.uk</a>&gt;</span><br>
                Date: 9 November 2013 02:38<br>
                Subject: [Seavox] A question of principle on instruments<br>
                To: "<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:seavox@mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk">seavox@mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk</a>"
                &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:seavox@mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk">seavox@mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk</a>&gt;<br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <div><font face="Calibri, sans-serif">
                    <div>Dear All,</div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div>An issue is arising with a request to add a set
                      of additional XBT entries to the SeaVoX instrument
                      vocabulary (L22).&nbsp; In most cases, this includes
                      two entries for certain physical types of XBT
                      (e.g. Sippican T5) with the entries differentiated
                      by the fall-rate equation applied (Sippican or
                      GOOS). I'm a little uneasy about this as to me it
                      could be viewed as shoe-horning information that
                      isn't actually instrument type into the instrument
                      description. However, I am also aware of
                      instruments that have multiple designations and
                      all that's different between the variants is the
                      firmware.</div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div>Anybody else have any views on this?</div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div>Cheers, Roy.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div>Please note that I now work part-time from
                      Tuesday to Thursday.&nbsp; E-mail response on other
                      days is possible but not guaranteed!</div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div><font size="3" face="Times New Roman, serif"><br>
                      </font></div>
                    <div><font size="3" face="Times New Roman, serif"><u>&nbsp;
                          ________________________________ &nbsp;</u></font></div>
                    <div><font size="1" face="Arial, sans-serif"
                        color="#808080">This message (and any
                        attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
                        subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000
                        and the contents of this email and any reply you
                        make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is
                        exempt from release under the Act. Any material
                        supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic
                        records management system.<br>
                      </font></div>
                  </font></div>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                Seavox mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Seavox@mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk">Seavox@mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/seavox"
                  target="_blank">http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/seavox</a><br>
              </div>
              <br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
        </div>
        <script id="dstb-id" language="javascript">if(typeof(dstb)!= "undefined"){ dstb();}</script></div>
      <br>
      <hr>
      <font size="1" face="Arial" color="Gray">This message (and any
        attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the
        Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email
        and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is
        exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC
        may be stored in an electronic records management system.<br>
      </font>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>