[Medin_dacwg] clarification from Defra regarding compliance of discovery metadata with GEMINI 2.3 by end FY2019.

Mon Jul 22 10:07:48 BST 2019

Hi All

Is this a stupid question but does anyone know if there is a specific list of datasets classed as a European Environment Agency Priority Datasets?  (I am currently trying to find out if NRWs Internal Reporting team know)

I know it may include things like Bathing Water, Natura 2000 sites etc.... Which NRW hold at the Welsh level, however these datasets would be collated at the UK level to supply to the EEA and presumably UK level metadata to the relevant standard created and supplied by the organisation that provides the data to Europe.  Just trying to work out if NRW need to do anything here and what the urgency is.

Monica

Monica Jones
Arweinydd Tîm Gwasanaethau Data / Data Services Team Leader
Cyfarwyddiaeth Tystiolaeth, Polisi a Thrwyddedu / Evidence, Policy and Permitting Directorate
Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru / Natural Resources Wales
03000 654998
07825 450437
Maes-y-Ffynnon, Bangor

www.cyfoethnaturiol.cymru<http://www.cyfoethnaturiol.cymru/?lang=cy> / www.naturalresources.wales<https://www.naturalresources.wales/?lang=en>

Yn falch o arwain y ffordd at ddyfodol gwell i Gymru trwy reoli'r amgylchedd ac adnoddau naturiol yn gynaliadwy.
Proud to be leading the way to a better future for Wales by managing the environment and natural resources sustainably.

[https://cyfoethnaturiolcymru.sharepoint.com/SiteCollectionImages/fb.png]<https://www.facebook.com/NatResWales> [https://cyfoethnaturiolcymru.sharepoint.com/SiteCollectionImages/twitter.png] <https://twitter.com/NatResWales>  [https://cyfoethnaturiolcymru.sharepoint.com/SiteCollectionImages/youtube.png] <https://www.youtube.com/user/NatResWales>  [https://cyfoethnaturiolcymru.sharepoint.com/SiteCollectionImages/flikr.png] <https://www.flickr.com/people/natreswales/>

Croesewir gohebiaeth yn Gymraeg a byddwn yn ymateb yn Gymraeg, heb i hynny arwain at oedi
Correspondence in Welsh is welcomed, and we will respond in Welsh without it leading to a delay

From: Gaffney, Sean P. <sgaf at bodc.ac.uk>
Sent: 15 July 2019 12:19
To: medin_dacwg at mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk
Cc: Ayliffe, James O. <jamayl at bodc.ac.uk>; Cefas Data Manager mailbox <data.manager at cefas.co.uk>; chelsea.bradbury at thecrownestate.co.uk; james.dargie <james.dargie at nature.scot>; Esther Hughes <esthug at mba.ac.uk>; Evans, Gaynor <gaev at bodc.ac.uk>; Graeme Duncan <graeme.duncan at jncc.gov.uk>; Robinson, Harriet <Harriet.Robinson at cyfoethnaturiolcymru.gov.uk>; Henni, Paul H. <phoh at bgs.ac.uk>; James Cooke <james.cooke at ukho.gov.uk>; James Rapaport <james.rapaport at oceanwise.eu>; Laura Hanley (Cefas) <laura.hanley at cefas.co.uk>; Lauren Fidler <laufid at mba.ac.uk>; Jones, Monica <Monica.Jones at cyfoethnaturiolcymru.gov.uk>; Mowat, Mary R. <mmow at bgs.ac.uk>; natasha.taylor at cefas.co.uk; Oliver Williams (Cefas) <oliver.williams at cefas.co.uk>; Postlethwaite, Clare <cfpo at bodc.ac.uk>; q.harpham at hrwallingford.com; rona.sinclair <rona.sinclair at nature.scot>; steve.gontarek at sams.ac.uk; Summer Grundy <sumgru at mba.ac.uk>; Thorne, Kay <klt at bodc.ac.uk>; Wright, Roseanna L. <roswri at bodc.ac.uk>
Subject: clarification from Defra regarding compliance of discovery metadata with GEMINI 2.3 by end FY2019.

Dear MEDIN DAC and Standards Working Groups,

I have received clarification recently from Defra around when MEDIN discovery metadata should comply with GEMINI 2.3 for submission to data.gov.uk.

I had earlier this year presented to you all my understanding that there was a hard deadline that new records for submission to data.gov.uk must be compliant with GEMINI 2.3 from 1 January 2020. This understanding was based on feedback from IST/36 and the GEMINI Working Group, who had been in contact with Defra.

The situation has since evolved and Defra have now provided direct clarification to me on the timings for compliance.

Defra have now informed me that only those records that are part of the European Environment Agency Priority Datasets must be compliant with GEMINI 2.3 by the end of the calendar year 2019. Defra state "In respect of timing of the transition to 2.3, we are fully aware that getting all of the 23.5k metadata records updated will be an ongoing work in progress beyond December 2019 (the multiple and disparate group of spatial data publishers makes this inevitable)."

Jason King of Defra, in his communication to me, goes on to say "Although we are aiming at December 2019, going forward we want data.gov.uk<http://data.gov.uk> to be permissive past December: making sure that they can support 2.3, but not requiring it. We want 2.2 records to produce warnings to encourage people to move to 2.3, but not to block harvesting."

For MEDIN therefore, our goal is that we will still aim to provide upgraded versions of the tools (online tool, Metadata Maesto, Schematron, XSD) for you all to create new MEDIN v3.0 records (thereby complying with GEMINI 2.3) before end 2019, but we will do so in the knowledge that if delivery of the upgraded tools moves into 2020, this will not cause you as metadata creators to fail compliance with data.gov.uk.

If you have any questions on this, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Regards

Sean
[cid:image001.png at 01D42B30.39763620]

                Dr Sean Gaffney
                Manager, MEDIN Standards and Guidelines Work Stream
                Joseph Proudman Building, 6 Brownlow Street Liverpool L3 5DA
                w: www.medin.org.uk<http://www.medin.org.uk>; e: sgaf at bodc.ac.uk<mailto:sgaf at bodc.ac.uk>; t: +44 (0) 151 795 4950

This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named recipients. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or any of its attachments and should notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system.
UK Research and Innovation has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise risk of this email or any attachments containing viruses or malware but the recipient should carry out its own virus and malware checks before opening the attachments. UK Research and Innovation does not accept any liability for any losses or damages which the recipient may sustain due to presence of any viruses.
Opinions, conclusions or other information in this message and attachments that are not related directly to UK Research and Innovation business are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of UK Research and Innovation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/medin_dacwg/attachments/20190722/387ec0fe/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 16858 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/medin_dacwg/attachments/20190722/387ec0fe/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3483 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/medin_dacwg/attachments/20190722/387ec0fe/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3437 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/medin_dacwg/attachments/20190722/387ec0fe/attachment-0007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4696 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/medin_dacwg/attachments/20190722/387ec0fe/attachment-0008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3148 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL: <http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/medin_dacwg/attachments/20190722/387ec0fe/attachment-0009.png>