[OntGov] GEMET

[Haddad, Tanya]

Hi Roy,

For what it's worth, I had a quick look and picked a Top 10 for what it's worth from what I guess would be Oregon's perspective:


 *   biology
 *   climate
 *   disasters, accidents, risk
 *   environmental policy
 *   fishery
 *   geography
 *   natural areas, landscape, ecosystems
 *   natural dynamics
 *   resources
 *   water

My list is a bit weak on the Human side of the CZM equation, and that is probably because our coast is rather rural compared to most. So to round it out to a Top 12 I guess I would add:


 *   social aspects, population
 *   tourism

Is that what you were after?

Tanya

Tanya C. Haddad | Oregon Coastal Management Program
Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation and Development
800 NE Oregon St, Suite 1145 | Portland, OR  97232
Office: (971) 673-0962 | Fax: (971) 673-0911
tanya.haddad at state.or.us | http://www.oregon.gov/lcd/


________________________________
From: ontgov-bounces at biwebs1.nerc-liv.ac.uk [mailto:ontgov-bounces at biwebs1.nerc-liv.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Lowry, Roy K
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:55 AM
To: ontgov at mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk
Subject: [OntGov] GEMET

Dear All,

I am currently assessing the semantic relevance of GEMET to NETMAR. At the URL http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/index_html?langcode=en is a list of the 40 concepts at the GEMET top level.  Each of these expands into a list of narrower concepts.

My objective is to determine the subset of the top-level concepts that include concepts of relevance to the NETMAR use case scenarios.  I will work through systematically and come up with a list, but I would appreciate it, particularly from the coastal atlas domain where my knowledge is rather patchy, if anyone with the time could have a browse and let me know any of the top-level concepts that they feel are relevant.

Cheers, Roy.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/ontgov/attachments/20100722/95a51671/attachment.html