[Seavox] Draft mapping
Luis Bermudez
bermudez at mbari.org
Thu Feb 8 06:09:15 GMT 2007
John,
On Feb 7, 2007, at 8:03 AM, John Graybeal wrote:
> My question for Luis is whether there is a SKOS relationship that
> reflects this intersection of properly indexed resources, where the
> two overlap but neither subset or superset relationships exist.
SKOS suggest other two types of mapping relations:
majorMatch
If 'concept A has-major-match concept B' then the set of resources
properly indexed against concept A shares more than 50% of its
members with the set of resources properly indexed against concept B.
minorMatch
If 'concept A has-minor-match concept B' then the set of resources
properly indexed against concept A shares less than 50% but greater
than 0 of its members with the set of resources properly indexed
against concept B.
Even though is not expressed, I believe the previous two mapping
relations are symmetric. Meaning that if A has-major-match B, then B
has-major-match A.
In the case of Roy's example:
A: nutrients in the ocean
B: nitrate in the water column
We can say that:
A and B are not exact
A is not broader than B
A is not narrower than B
so we have two choices: mayor math or minor match
Nitrate is just one type of nutrient (there are others like:
phosphorus, carbon, sulfur, etc..), and water column is very general
and can occur in any possible body of water( lake, river etc.) . Due
to the previous facts I will say that is a minorMatch relation.
-Luis
More information about the Seavox
mailing list