[Seavox] L221 boundaries

[Lauret Olivier]

Hello Roy,

 

I would personally vote for keep L221 like it is, and add one or several new SKOS file(s) to include such data production vocabularies. 

I guess in short-term it's easier to put all extensions into L221, but I'm afraid in long-term you could regret it..

 

Cheers,

 

Olivier. 

 

De : seavox-bounces at biwebs1.nerc-liv.ac.uk [mailto:seavox-bounces at biwebs1.nerc-liv.ac.uk] De la part de Lowry, Roy K.
Envoyé : lundi 6 décembre 2010 14:27
À : seavox at mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk
Objet : [Seavox] L221 boundaries

 

Dear All,

 

The L221 list is currently being built as 'Terms for distinct sampling or measuring devices that may be identified in the real world in terms of manufacturer and model number.' A question has been raised within BODC as to whether this should be extended to include software involved in data production.  If so, should this be restricted to software that generates data like numerical models or should it include processing software used to work up data such as SeaSoft?

 

Opinions and/or advice welcome.

 

Cheers, Roy.

 


-- 
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC 
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents 
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless 
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to 
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

Cliquez ici <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/z4BVwLUyLPfTndxI!oX7UhRB+CUevtsBAz4tj6KPfcuycaD557eQhpyvbRRINjeCySIQKr466RhhUYCj!eKynw==>  si ce message est indésirable (pourriel).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/seavox/attachments/20101206/d92bbc96/attachment.html