[Seavox] L221 boundaries

[Lowry, Roy K.]

Thanks John,

I think I'm with you and Olivier here.  I can also see issues with METAFOR model annotation documents being populated with sensors and water samples collected by software (on the basis that if a mistake is physically possible, somebody will make it).

 A related question to anybody with knowledge/interest in SKOS is.  If the software catalogue and device catalogue are considered SKOS concept schemes, could those schemes be considered members of a SKOS collection?

Cheers, Roy.

From: John Graybeal [mailto:jbgraybeal at mindspring.com]
Sent: 06 December 2010 21:56
To: Lauret Olivier
Cc: Lowry, Roy K.; seavox at mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [Seavox] L221 boundaries

Concur.  The characteristics of interest for the terms are likely to be different as well -- maybe 'author' is similar to 'manufacturer', but the model number equivalent will often be quite a different kind of thing.

john

On Dec 6, 2010, at 06:54, Lauret Olivier wrote:


Hello Roy,

I would personally vote for keep L221 like it is, and add one or several new SKOS file(s) to include such data production vocabularies.
I guess in short-term it's easier to put all extensions into L221, but I'm afraid in long-term you could regret it..

Cheers,

Olivier.

De : seavox-bounces at biwebs1.nerc-liv.ac.uk<mailto:seavox-bounces at biwebs1.nerc-liv.ac.uk> [mailto:seavox-bounces at biwebs1.nerc-liv.ac.uk] De la part de Lowry, Roy K.
Envoyé : lundi 6 décembre 2010 14:27
À : seavox at mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk<mailto:seavox at mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk>
Objet : [Seavox] L221 boundaries

Dear All,

The L221 list is currently being built as 'Terms for distinct sampling or measuring devices that may be identified in the real world in terms of manufacturer and model number.' A question has been raised within BODC as to whether this should be extended to include software involved in data production.  If so, should this be restricted to software that generates data like numerical models or should it include processing software used to work up data such as SeaSoft?

Opinions and/or advice welcome.

Cheers, Roy.


--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

Cliquez ici<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/z4BVwLUyLPfTndxI!oX7UhRB+CUevtsBAz4tj6KPfcuycaD557eQhpyvbRRINjeCySIQKr466RhhUYCj!eKynw==> si ce message est indésirable (pourriel).

--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. _______________________________________________
Seavox mailing list
Seavox at mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk<mailto:Seavox at mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk>
http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/seavox


John Graybeal   <mailto:jgraybeal at ucsd.edu>
phone: 858-534-2162
System Development Manager
Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Project: http://ci.oceanobservatories.org
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.nerc-liv.ac.uk/pipermail/seavox/attachments/20101207/ca6448f6/attachment.html